dc.contributor.author | RENDA, Andrea | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-21T07:37:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-21T07:37:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/71700 | |
dc.description | This STG Resilience Paper is part of the Commission Research Report and Interim Progress Report (June 2021) published by Reform for Resilience. | en |
dc.description.abstract | • The pandemic revealed at once the lack of preparedness of many governments,
and the inadequacy of existing scientific advice mechanisms in times of
emergency.
• Use of foresight techniques and meaningful scientific advice can help
governments anticipate possible low-probability, high-impact events that could
have a disruptive impact on the economy and society. However, these techniques
should be fully embedded in the policy cycle.
• Policies should be stress-tested regularly to ensure that they remain relevant and
able to withstand unforeseen shocks.
• The bottom-up nature of contemporary policy evaluation is, by design,
incompatible with long-term objectives such as ensuring systemic resilience.
• Rather than cost-benefit analysis, a more suitable decision-making criterion in
policy appraisal would be the adoption of multi-criteria analysis, under the
condition that criteria adopted for decision-making incorporate resilience
alongside other policy goals, such as sustainability. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | European University Institute | en |
dc.publisher | Recovery Reform Resilience | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | STG Resilience Papers | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2021 | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.r4rx.org/research-submissions | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.title | Walking the post-pandemic talk : how to incorporate resilience in better regulation systems | en |
dc.type | Technical Report | en |