Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMITRA, Aruni
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T13:07:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-28T13:07:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1830-7728
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/71759
dc.description.abstractWhat explains the sudden vanishing of the procyclicality of productivity in the U.S. during the 1980s? Using cross-sectional evidence from states and industries, this paper argues that lower costs of hiring and firing workers due to rapid de-unionization can help explain the productivity puzzle. Lower cost of changing employment prompts firms to rely less on labour hoarding, thereby making productivity less procyclical. In a model with endogenous worker-effort and costly employment adjustment, allowing the hiring cost to decrease by the same amount as the decline in union density can match almost the entire drop in cyclical productivity correlations.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI MWPen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2021/05en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectProductivityen
dc.subjectUnionsen
dc.subjectHiring costen
dc.subjectFactor utilizationen
dc.subjectDSGEen
dc.titleThe productivity puzzle and the decline of unionsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International