Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHUNGER, Sophia
dc.contributor.authorPAXTON, Fred
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T13:25:48Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T13:25:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPolitical science research and methods, 2022, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 617-633en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/72611
dc.description.abstractAlthough attention to populism is ever-increasing, the concept remains contested. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of populism research and identifies tendencies to a conflation of host ideologies and populism in political science through a two-step analysis. First, we conduct a quantitative review of 884 abstracts from 2004 to 2018 using text-as-data methods. We show that scholars sit at “separate tables,” divided by geographical foci, methods, and host ideologies. Next, our qualitative analysis of 50 articles finds a common conflation of populism with other ideologies, resulting in the analytical neglect of the former. We, therefore, urge researchers to properly distinguish populism from “what it travels with” and engage more strongly with the dynamic interlinkages between thin and thick ideologies.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofPolitical science research and methodsen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectText and content analysisen
dc.subjectPopulismen
dc.subjectHost ideologyen
dc.subjectRadical righten
dc.subjectRadical leften
dc.titleWhat's in a buzzword? : a systematic review of the state of populism research in political scienceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/psrm.2021.44
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.startpage617
dc.identifier.endpage633
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record