Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRUBIO MARIN, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T07:22:24Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T07:22:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCurrent legal problems, 2021, OnlineFirsten
dc.identifier.issn2044-8422
dc.identifier.issn0070-1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/73084
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 9 November 2021en
dc.description.abstractThis article is an attempt to explain the forms in which constitutionalism has facilitated or hindered women’s equal citizenship throughout history and with a particular emphasis on Western constitutionalism, especially the US and continental Europe, but also with an eye on new constitutionalism and its innovations. In so doing, the article takes into account not only women’s access to the rights first conquered by men but also the extent to which the forms of participation traditionally assigned to women—neither in the state nor in the marketplace, but rather in the household and in the family—have become recognized as forms of citizenship contribution. In other words, it tells the story of the relevance of constitutionalism for women’s citizenship as defined in male terms (that is to say, with a focus on equal rights and participation in the so-called public sphere), as well as for women’s ability to redefine the very understanding of citizenship to include participation in social reproduction, in and through the so-called domestic sphere.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent legal problemsen
dc.titleOn constitutionalism and women's citizenshipen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/clp/cuab013
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record