dc.contributor.author | VIEHOFF, Juri | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-24T13:32:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-24T13:32:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European journal of philosophy, 2022, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 546-564 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0966-8373 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-0378 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74234 | |
dc.description | Published online: 06 September 2021 | en |
dc.description.abstract | May European Union (EU) member states, in the pursuit of enforcing the norms of ‘EU justice’, unilaterally adopt harmful policies that are ordinarily impermissible in the course of voluntary cooperation amongst democratic states? Though conditions of permissible vigilantism are strict and only rarely met, there are some basic EU duties the compliance with which each individual member state is permitted to enforce unilaterally. Such measures are sometimes permissible even if European community law says otherwise: to the extent that European law prevents states from enforcing these duties, it lacks authority. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Wiley Transformative Agreement (2020-2023) | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | European journal of philosophy | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Solidarity under duress : defending state vigilantism | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ejop.12700 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 546 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 564 | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
dc.rights.license | Attribution 4.0 International | * |