Open Access
Some remarks on the ethical relevance of leaky abstractions
Loading...
Files
AlmadaLeaky2021.pdf (198.78 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Mario ARIAS-OLIVA, Jorge ARIAS-OLIVA, Eva REINARES-LARA, Kiyoshi MURATA (eds), [New] Normal technology ethics : proceedings of the ETHICOMP 2021, Logroño : Universidad de La Rioja, 2021, pp. 243-245
Cite
ALMADA, Marco, Some remarks on the ethical relevance of leaky abstractions, in Mario ARIAS-OLIVA, Jorge ARIAS-OLIVA, Eva REINARES-LARA, Kiyoshi MURATA (eds), [New] Normal technology ethics : proceedings of the ETHICOMP 2021, Logroño : Universidad de La Rioja, 2021, pp. 243-245 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74415
Abstract
Algorithms occupy a central place in the current debates on the ethics of computing. The term “algorithm”, however, is used to refer both to specific socio-technical systems and to the logical abstractions at the heart of these systems, and this ambiguity can mislead analyses of the ethical impact of real-world applications of AI systems. In this paper, I discuss two analytical failure modes that follow from this ambiguity — algorithm reductionism and algorithm fetishism —, arguing that they stem from the attempt to find an ideal vantage point for understanding an AI system. To mitigate the impact of reductionism and fetishism, I propose that we need to adopt analytical tools that look at various levels of abstraction rather than picking one of them as the correct description of a system. Such a multi-layered approach would contribute to the design of effective ethical and legal interventions in AI systems, thus contributing to the socially beneficial use of intelligent technologies.