Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHALMAI, Gábor
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T09:13:06Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T09:13:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGiuliano AMATO, Benedetta BARBISAN and Cesare PINELLI (eds), Rule of law vs majoritarian democracy, Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2021, pp. 171-188en
dc.identifier.isbn9781509936861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74479
dc.descriptionPublished online: 26 August 2021en
dc.description.abstractWhile discussing illiberalism the focus of this chapter will be institutional. From this perspective the main object of illiberal critique is liberal democracy, which in my view is not merely a limit on the public power of the majority, but also presup- poses rule of law, checks and balances, and guaranteed fundamental rights. This means that there is no democracy without liberalism, and there also cannot be liberal rights without democracy. In this respect, there is no such a thing as an ‘illiberal or anti-liberal democracy’.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHart Publishingen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleDoes illiberal democracy exist?en
dc.typeContribution to booken


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record