Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFARGUES, Emilien Louis Maurice
dc.contributor.authorSOLANO, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorHUDDLESTON, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorVINK, Maarten Peter
dc.contributor.authorSCHMID, Samuel D.
dc.contributor.authorBAUBÖCK, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorPEDROZA, Luicy
dc.contributor.authorPALOP-GARCÍA, Pau
dc.contributor.authorDZANKIC, Jelena
dc.contributor.authorMANTHA-HOLLANDS, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T12:00:57Z
dc.date.available2022-06-07T12:00:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74586
dc.description.abstractThanks to the work undertaken by different research teams (GLOBALCIT, MACIMIDE, MIPEX…), data on citizenship policies are becoming available on a wide range of countries worldwide. The collection of these data makes it possible to develop new comparative research frameworks that go beyond the dominant European/Western-centred perspective that we find in traditional citizenship studies. The development of cross-regional comparative frameworks allows testing the generalisability of explanations for policy-variations more comprehensively and contributes to formulating new hypotheses and theories to account for both convergences and divergences across time and space. However, the need to adapt concepts and measurement tools to the different realities of citizenship at the global level raises important challenges. Drawing on the workshop ‘Going Global: Opportunities and Challenges for the Development of a Comparative Research Agenda on Naturalisation Policies at the Global Level’ that was convened in 2021 at the Robert Schuman Centre, under the framework of the Global Citizenship Governance programme, contributors to this working paper have been invited to reflect on the promises and difficulties that the articulation of a global comparative perspective in citizenship studies involves. Two main recommendations for the advancement of a comparative agenda at the global level stand out from this symposium: the first is to accommodate as much as possible the specificities of each context within the construction of comparative frameworks; the second is to acknowledge the biases and limitations of the perspective that we take as researchers. It therefore emerges that in order to make a distinct contribution to scholarly knowledge by expanding the geographical scope of their investigations, citizenship scholars need to address the challenge of comparability.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 716350).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/716350/EUen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2022/41en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-472en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCitizenshipen
dc.subjectComparative researchen
dc.subjectGlobal perspectiveen
dc.subjectComparabilityen
dc.titleGoing global : opportunities and challenges for the development of a comparative research agenda on citizenship policies at the global levelen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International