Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBERTRAM, Daniel Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T13:01:15Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T13:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGlobal environmental politics, 2022, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 117-135en
dc.identifier.issn1526-3800
dc.identifier.issn1536-0091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74809
dc.descriptionPublished online: 1 May 2022en
dc.description.abstractThe transnational scope of corporate activities often results in extraterritorial environmental harm elsewhere on the planet. Within the European context, two legal developments are challenging this state of affairs. First, several legislative initiatives seek to establish due diligence standards for corporate activities along global supply chains. Second, domestic courts increasingly assume jurisdiction over environmental damage arising from corporations’ subsidiary operations abroad. This article argues that both these developments are emblematic of the transnationalization and judicialization of environmental governance in the twenty-first century. Rather than providing particularized relief only, national judges may become crucial allies in the construction and enforcement of polycentric regimes. However, the advent of unilateral judicial interventions in the environmental affairs of other countries also raises concerns over the international and institutional legitimacy of the emerging corporate accountability apparatus.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMIT Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal environmental politicsen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleJudicializing environmental governance? : the case of transnational corporate accountabilityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/glep_a_00651
dc.identifier.volume22en
dc.identifier.startpage117en
dc.identifier.endpage135en
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record