Open Access
Geopolitical competition, globalization and WTO reform
Loading...
Files
RSC_WP_2022_67_rev.pdf (534.6 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
EUI RSC; 2022/67; Global Governance Programme-482; [Global Economics]
Cite
HOEKMAN, Bernard M., MAVROIDIS, Petros C., NELSON, Douglas, Geopolitical competition, globalization and WTO reform, EUI RSC, 2022/67, Global Governance Programme-482, [Global Economics] - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75022
Abstract
Global trade and investment is increasingly characterized by systemic conflicts, giving rise to unilateral policies to attain competitiveness, national security and other noneconomic objectives. Disparate national measures motivated by all these objectives targeting the global value chains that have helped drive globalization create policy uncertainty, increase political risk and potentially distort trade and investment decisions. Sustaining an open, rules-based trade system calls for deliberation to help clarify underlying policy objectives, assess effectiveness and spillover effects of domestic measures. Policy dialogue centered on the use of specific trade concerns, already used in some WTO agreements, offers a path forward for such dialogue, one that may be more effective than formal dispute settlement, assuming a functioning dispute resolution system can be re-established, in coping with the return of geopolitical rivalry. Plurilateral cooperation among like-minded nations on the use of trade policies to pursue noneconomic objectives, and between the large trade powers on economic policies that generate competitiveness concerns, are both a pragmatic and efficient path forward in addressing spillovers associated with the rise of unilateral trade action motivated by security considerations and domestic nontrade objectives.