Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPOLO VILLANUEVA, Fredy D.
dc.contributor.authorTEGEGNE, Yitagesu T.
dc.contributor.authorWINKEL, Georg
dc.contributor.authorCERUTTI, Paolo Omar
dc.contributor.authorRAMCILOVIC-SUOMINEN, Sabaheta
dc.contributor.authorMCDERMOTT, Constance L.
dc.contributor.authorZEITLIN, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorSOTIROV, Metodi
dc.contributor.authorCASHORE, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorWARDELL, David Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHAYWOOD, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorGIESSEN, Lukas
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T14:00:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T14:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of environmental management, 2023, Vol. 327, Art. 116874en
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/75171
dc.descriptionPublished online: 22 November 2022en
dc.description.abstractThe EU's Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan (FLEGT) adopted in 2003 includes bilateral trade agreements known as Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) signed between the EU and timber-supplying countries. The EU has invested more than 1.5 billion euros in VPAs; however, only one of the seven concerned countries has managed to complete all the necessary requirements to expire FLEGT licences. Since there is no research that comprehensively integrates the scientific evidence regarding the effects of this policy, this study systematically reviews all empirical scientific studies on the effects of VPAs. We found that almost all relevant studies are case reports that use qualitative data and focus on only one country at a time, mainly Ghana, Cameroon, or Indonesia. The evidence suggests that while VPAs have contributed to the establishment of governance structures, tools, and procedures they have not been able to solve social problems (i.e., inequality and injustice) and have potentially harmed the economies of EU timber suppliers. Evidence on the effects of VPAs on illegal logging and trade and the environment remains limited. Thus, future research should focus on more countries; use a greater range of methods, including comparative experimental designs; explore possible intended effects on under-researched categories; and systematically investigate unintended effects on other categories within and outside the forestry sector.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of environmental managementen
dc.titleEffects of EU illegal logging policy on timber-supplying countries : a systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116874
dc.identifier.volume327en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record