Open Access
The race is not to the swift : the role of social cognition in reproducing class-based inequality
Loading...
Files
Foley_2023_SPS.pdf (1.89 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, 2023
EUI; SPS; PhD Thesis
Cite
FOLEY, William Michael, The race is not to the swift : the role of social cognition in reproducing class-based inequality, Florence : European University Institute, 2023, EUI, SPS, PhD Thesis - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75263
Abstract
For sociologists, social class determines life outcomes in a myriad of different ways. But for the general public, class has never mattered as little. Class has become the “dark matter” of society, a potent yet invisible force shaping social reality. What accounts for the persistent, yet invisible power of class? In this thesis I argue that much of contemporary class inequality is driven by the widespread belief that “class = competence”. This belief biases third party assessment of performance, directly affects performance and decision-making through internalising expectations, and buttresses the status quo by legitimising inequality as the result of meritocratic processes. Yet, potent as it is, the effects of this belief are not obvious because it appears to be nothing more than the common sense observation that those who achieve positions of power, wealth, and prestige are highly competent. In this thesis, I explore how this belief is driven by social cognitive processes. In particular, I look at psychological heuristics designed to facilitate social action in the context of uncertainty. Each empirical chapter sets out to address three important mechanisms related to the “class = competence” belief. The first empirical chapter establishes that the “class = competence” belief leads to biased third party evaluations of performance. The second empirical chapter shows that working class students internalise the “class = competence” belief, decreasing their likelihood of attending university. The third chapter explores how the belief emerges by testing a mechanism based on cognitive dissonance reduction.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Defence date: 25 January 2023
Examining Board: Prof. Klarita Gërxhani, EUI (EUI Supervisor); Prof. Arnout van de Rijt (EUI); Prof. Cecilia L. Ridgeway (Stanford University); Prof. Carlo Barone (Sciences Po)
Examining Board: Prof. Klarita Gërxhani, EUI (EUI Supervisor); Prof. Arnout van de Rijt (EUI); Prof. Cecilia L. Ridgeway (Stanford University); Prof. Carlo Barone (Sciences Po)