Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARZIA, Diego
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA DA SILVA, Frederico
dc.identifier.citationLausanne : University of Lausanne, 2021en
dc.description.abstractAbout one third of American voters cast a vote more ‘against’ than ‘for’ a candidate in the 2020 Presidential election. This pattern, designated by negative voting, has been initially understood by rational choice scholarship as a product of cognitive dissonance and/or retrospective evaluations. This working paper revisits this concept through the affective polarization framework in the light of the rise of political sectarianism in American society. Based on an original CAWI survey fielded after the 2020 election, our regression analysis demonstrates that the predicted probability of casting a negative vote significantly increases among individuals for whom out-candidate hate outweighs in-candidate love. Negative voting is less prevalent among partisans as their higher levels of in-group affection can offset out-group contempt. By asserting the enduring relevance of negative voting in American presidential elections, we aim at stimulating further comparative research and discussion of its implications for democratic representation.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSwiss National Science Foundation (grant nr. PCEFP1_186898).en
dc.publisherUniversity of Lausanneen
dc.titleNegative voting revisited : the 2020 US presidential electionen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*

Files associated with this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International