Open Access
It’s unfair! : non-price exploitation in ICT patents licenses
Loading...
Files
Unfair_non-price_explotation_Art_2023.pdf (317 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0018-9855; 2195-0237
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
International review of intellectual property and competition law, 2023, Vol. 54, pp. 200-222
Cite
GALLI, Niccolò, BOTTA, Marco, It’s unfair! : non-price exploitation in ICT patents licenses, International review of intellectual property and competition law, 2023, Vol. 54, pp. 200-222 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75382
Abstract
This paper analyses controversial patent licensing conditions in the Information Communication Technology (ICT) sector as ‘‘unfair trading conditions’’ under Art. 102(a) TFEU. It argues that the application of the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation does not prevent the assessment of patent licensing conditions under Art. 102 if the licensor is dominant in the market. Hence, the article examines four categories of controversial licensing conditions in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union under Art. 102(a): grant-back clauses, no-challenge clauses, portfolio-wide licenses, and contract term decoupled from patent validity. Developing old precedents in new application cases, the abuse-of-dominance analysis finds that each license clause is capable of anticompetitive exploitative effects, as much as offsetting justifications. As a result, the qualification of any such clause as ‘‘unfair’’ needs a case-by-case approach considering the overall content of the ICT patent licensing agreement. Whether the overall efficiencies outweigh the anti-competitive effects is always a question of degree. Nonetheless, this article contributes to legal predictability by identifying the opposing economic arguments of dominant patent licensors and complaining licensees. It concludes that both parties have strings to their bows.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 13 February 2023
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Springer Transformative Agreement (2020-2024)