Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNELKEN, David
dc.contributor.authorSIEMS, Mathias
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T10:20:04Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T10:20:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationShauhin TALESH, Elizabeth MERTZ and Heinz KLUG (eds), Research handbook on modern legal realism, Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2021, pp. 263-276en
dc.identifier.isbn9781788117760
dc.identifier.isbn9781788117777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/75428
dc.descriptionPublished online: 18 March 2021en
dc.description.abstractThe chapter aims to show why the uses and abuses of global social indicators is a topic well suited to research guided by the new legal realism. Social indicators are ubiquitous as a form of social intervention designed to measure and monitor a variety of key social issues – whether it be levels of business friendliness, corruption or human trafficking, respect for the rule of law and free speech, or compliance with codes of corporate responsibility. But indicators do not only provide information, they also exert authority and so need to be better understood as an example of the normative uses of quantification. The chapter first defines indicators, distinguishes kinds of indicators, relates them to other kinds of normative regulation and discusses how they are used. It then examines what abuse of indicators could mean, highlights the many problems with making, implementing and interpreting them, and revisits what are called their knowledge and governance “effects”. It concludes by considering the possibilities for re-forming indicators by drawing on resources from the market, science, politics and law.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEdward Elgar Publishingen
dc.titleThe uses and abuses of global social indicatorsen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.4337/9781788117777.00030


Files associated with this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record