Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHOEFFLER, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T11:35:27Z
dc.date.available2023-11-29T11:35:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPolitics and governance, 2023, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 154-164en
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76117
dc.descriptionPublished online: 29 November 2023en
dc.description.abstractHow does the EU adapt its policies in response to current global changes? Extant scholarship has shed light on the EU’s geopolitical turn by analysing it as either a shift away from neoliberalism or a reshuffling of EU–US relations. This article makes the case for studying how these two dynamics interact. To do so, I draw on the economic patriotism framework, which focuses on the links between types and spaces of economic interventionism. Economic patriotism instruments can take various forms depending on their type (liberal/protectionist instruments) and space of reference (national/EU/transatlantic/international). From this perspective, the EU has responded to global changes by shifting from liberal to protectionist instruments of economic patriotism. However, the design of these policy instruments reflects compromises between the preferences of policymakers who adopt liberal/protectionist and Europeanist/Atlanticist positions. As policy instruments can create room for compromise because they allow various positions to converge, EU protectionist economic instruments cater to Atlanticist and liberal preferences too. This article illustrates this argument by means of EU armament policy. Using official documents and interviews, I analyse changes in EU economic patriotism by looking at the two major policy instruments: the 2009 Defence Procurement Directive and the 2021 European Defence Fund. Whereas the 2009 Directive reflected liberal economic patriotism anchored in the transatlantic space, the European Defence Fund illustrates tensions between types and spaces of economic interventionism in the EU’s geopolitical turn: Some clauses protect the EU from foreign interference, but its political-economic space of reference remains strongly transatlantic.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCogitatio Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofPolitics and governanceen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleArming fortress Europe? : spaces and instruments of economic patriotism in EU armament policyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/pag.v11i4.7231
dc.identifier.volume11en
dc.identifier.startpage154en
dc.identifier.endpage164en
dc.identifier.issue4en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International