Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSTONE, Diane Lesley
dc.contributor.authorSCHMIDER, Anneke
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T16:29:05Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T16:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPolicy and society, 2023, OnlineFirsten
dc.identifier.issn1449-4035
dc.identifier.issn1839-3373
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76151
dc.descriptionPublished online: 01 September 2023en
dc.description.abstract“Global Commissions of Inquiry” have usually been associated with the multilateral initiatives of governments and international organizations. However, various styles of “global commission” have emerged over time. During the COVID-19 pandemic, global commissions have been a key aspect of the COVID-19 international policy landscape, quickly emerging, in 2020 and 2021, to corral knowledge and evidence. These include “formal” commissions, such as the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response and the Global Commission for Post-Pandemic Policy, and “informal” commissions, including the Reform for Resilience and The Lancet Covid Commissions. This paper considers whether these Commissions have been engines for new ideas and global policy knowledge or whether this “chorus” of COVID Commissions represented a “clutter” of ideas at a time when global policy focus was needed. Global Commissions, in general, deserve greater scholarly attention to their design and the construction of their legitimate authority as hybrid and private commissions enter global policy making alongside official commissions.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofPolicy and societyen
dc.titleExpert knowledge for global pandemic policy : a chorus of evidence or a clutter of global commissions?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/polsoc/puad022


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record