Open Access
Saving humankind with domestic mandatory human rights due diligence laws : a third world approach to international law
Loading...
Files
AEL_2024_07.pdf (1.13 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1831-4066
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI; LAW; AEL; Working Paper; 2024/07; European Society of International Law (ESIL) Paper
Cite
LI, Zhuolun, XIANG, Yu, Saving humankind with domestic mandatory human rights due diligence laws : a third world approach to international law, EUI, LAW, AEL, Working Paper, 2024/07, European Society of International Law (ESIL) Paper - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76750
Abstract
The process of holding transnational corporations (TNCs) accountable for human rights abuses has witnessed longstanding struggles between the Global North and South. Mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) laws are by far the latest legislative endeavors to regulate the human rights practices of TNCs through domestic laws. Currently, major mHRDD laws have emerged within Europe. Through networked global value chains, these laws have profound impacts on nations, populations, and suppliers in the Global South. However, we lack an adequate understanding of the consequences and implications of such laws from their perspectives. This article examines major mHRDD laws from a Third World Approach to International Law (TWAIL) perspective. It identifies three key features of mHRDD laws and explores how each feature may result in unintended oppression in the Global South. It finds that although the initial purpose of mHRDD legislation is to humanize global value chains, such legislation may entrench existing power imbalances between trade partners from Global North and South. Due to the affected stakeholders in the Third World being excluded from the legislative process of mHRDD laws, the protection of the existing laws is limited in that they can only be exercised in alignment with the legislative state’s domestic political and economic interests. This article proposes that mHRDD laws must be reformed to engage with a broader range of stakeholders and suggests the necessity of a business and human rights treaty.