Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPICCOLI, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorPERNA, Roberta
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T14:16:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-05T14:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationComparative migration studies, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 20, OnlineFirsten
dc.identifier.issn2214-594X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76779
dc.descriptionPublished online: 04 April 2024en
dc.description.abstractIndividuals who reside in a country without regular authorisation generally find it difficult to access public medical services beyond emergency treatment. Even in countries with universal healthcare, there is often a gap between rights on paper and their implementation. Civil society organisations (CSOs) fill this gap by providing medical services to vulnerable populations, including irregular migrants. What, if any, are the ethical dilemmas that arise for CSO staff when delivering such services in countries with universal healthcare? Under what conditions do these dilemmas arise? And what strategies do CSO staff use to mitigate them? We answer these questions using 40 semi-structured interviews with CSO staff working in two European countries with high levels of irregularity, universal healthcare provisions on paper, and significant differences in approaches and availability of public services for irregular migrants: Italy and Spain. We show that CSO staff providing medical services to irregular migrants in places with universal healthcare coverage face a fundamental dilemma between humanitarianism and equity. CSO staff respond to the humanitarian belief in the value of taking all possible steps to prevent or alleviate human suffering, thus promoting a decent quality of life that includes access to both emergency and non-emergency care. In doing so, however, they run the risk of substituting rather than complementing public provisions, thereby preventing governments from assuming responsibility for these services in the long term. Individuals who acknowledge the existence of this dilemma generally oppose the creation of parallel structures; that is, services specifically developed for irregular migrants outside the public system; while those who ignore it essentially subscribe to a tiered system, giving up on considerations of equity. We argue that CSOs involved in the provision of healthcare to irregular migrants do not simply provide services; they also play an inherently political role.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringerOpenen
dc.relation.ispartofComparative migration studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Migration Policy Centre]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleCivil society organisations and the healthcare of irregular migrants : the humanitarianism-equity dilemmaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40878-024-00372-5
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.identifier.issue20en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International