Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMONTI, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T09:42:05Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T09:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76828
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the constitutional theories behind the regulation of content moderation activities of social media platforms across the Atlantic and discusses the effects of a change in the constitutional approach in the United States on the structure of the digital market of social media platforms. The paper argues that the current coexistence of regulatory models across the European Union and the United States results from an interlocking of constitutional theories that permits an equilibrium between the different paradigms of free speech online. The paper assesses the current risks to this equilibrium arising from a different interpretation of the scope of the First Amendment online in the United States.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2024/07en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFreedom of expression onlineen
dc.subjectSocial media platformsen
dc.subjectContent-moderationen
dc.subjectDigital Services Acten
dc.subjectFirst Amendmenten
dc.titleThe 'unity of opposites' in the regulation of social media platforms : content moderation between the EUI 'Digital Services Act' and the US First Amendment theoriesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International