Date: 2024
Type: Other
Navigating challenges and enhancing effectiveness : a comprehensive analysis of Zambia's social cash transfer programme for poverty alleviation
EUI, STG, Policy Analysis, 2024/23
MULENGA, Mukuka Mpundu, Navigating challenges and enhancing effectiveness : a comprehensive analysis of Zambia's social cash transfer programme for poverty alleviation, EUI, STG, Policy Analysis, 2024/23 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77106
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
Zambia is one of the countries with the highest levels of poverty and inequality with approximately 60.5% of the population living below the poverty line. Rural areas are more affected, with 82% living in poverty compared to 18% in urban areas. To combat this, Zambia's Vision 2030 aims to reduce the national poverty rate to below 20% and the government has implemented the Social Cash Transfer (SCT) programme since 2003 to provide cash benefits to vulnerable households. Development partners such the World Bank, the governments of the United Kingdom and Sweden among others have provided financing for the SCT programme. However, the current programme faces challenges such as dependence on external aid, limited coverage, the poverty trap, sustainability, inadequate funding, targeting errors, corruption, and high administration costs. This policy analysis argues the need for the government to promote entrepreneurial skills and capacity building for the beneficiaries of the Social Cash Transfer as opposed to continually disbursing funds to them.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77106
Full-text via DOI: 10.2870/497665
ISBN: 9789294665195
ISSN: 2600-271X
Series/Number: EUI; STG; Policy Analysis; 2024/23
Publisher: European University Institute
Sponsorship and Funder information:
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.