Date: 2024
Type: Other
Enhancing governance in the democratic security sector and reforms in Malawi
EUI, STG, Policy Brief, 2024/27
NYANKALWA, Mayamiko, Enhancing governance in the democratic security sector and reforms in Malawi, EUI, STG, Policy Brief, 2024/27 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77301
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
Despite substantial global advances in democratic security governance and reforms in the past few decades, Malawi continues to lag significantly behind in achieving genuine democratic security governance and comprehensive reforms. This shortfall is attributable to a weak institutional framework and an absence of civilian control and oversight, which undermines accountability and transparency. Pervasive corruption and political interference pose significant threats to the independence and effectiveness of the security sector. Notably, recurrent misuse by politicians of the state security apparatus, including the intelligence service, the Malawi Police Service and paramilitary units, remains a critical concern. These entities are frequently deployed to intimidate civil society and suppress political opposition, thus eroding the foundational principles of democratic security sector reform and governance (SSRG). This policy paper examines the current state of security sector governance in Malawi, delves into its core principles, analyses the major challenges facing democratic security reform and governance, and proposes strategic policy recommendations to nurture democratic ideals, bolster the provision of security, and propel the nation towards comprehensive development, prosperity, and stability.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77301
Full-text via DOI: 10.2870/5072787
ISBN: 9789294666147
ISSN: 2600-271X
Series/Number: EUI; STG; Policy Brief; 2024/27
Publisher: European University Institute
Sponsorship and Funder information:
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.