Open Access
A Farewell to Constitutional Authorship? A Critique of the Presentist Turn in the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy
Loading...
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1830-7728
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI MWP; 2008/28
Cite
KUO, Ming-Sung, A Farewell to Constitutional Authorship? A Critique of the Presentist Turn in the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy, EUI MWP, 2008/28 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/9014
Abstract
“We the People” and the corresponding concept of constitutional authorship have
gripped our imagination of the legitimacy of constitutional democracy since the
American and French Revolutions. In contrast to this Big Bang scenario of constitutionmaking,
the constitutionalization of the European Union (EU) as a supranational entity
is the product of a decades-long process, departing from the Revolutionary tradition of
constitutionalism. Whether this “presentist” project of constitutionalization without
making a constitution, which is characterized by polyarchical everyday policy
negotiations and apolitical judicial decisions in the normality of the constitutional order,
will succeed in reconstructing our imagination of political order as an alternative to
constitutional authorship remains to be seen. This paper aims to answer this question
through a close inspection of Frank Michelman’s critical engagement with theories of
constitutional legitimacy. My investigation shows that Michelman arrives at a presentist
view of constitutional democracy after pointing out the inadequacy of theories of
constitutional legitimacy rooted in the Revolutionary tradition of constitutionalism. I
argue, however, that Michelman’s presentist view cannot fully account for the
legitimacy of public institutions in constitutional democracy without presupposing a
transtemporal view of identity, which is the reason why Michelman finds constitutional
authorship in tension with liberalism, and thus unacceptable. By showing that
Michelman’s presentist view of constitutional democracy is coherent with, rather than
being at odds with, constitutional authorship, I conclude that the latter will continue to
play a central role in our concept of the legitimacy of constitutional democracy.