The Roles Nations Play: A Study of Britain on the International Stage, 1962 – 1999
Florence, European University Institute, 2008 , EUI PhD theses, Department of Political and Social Sciences
MCCOURT, David, The Roles Nations Play: A Study of Britain on the International Stage, 1962 – 1999, Florence, European University Institute, 2008 , EUI PhD theses, Department of Political and Social Sciences - http://hdl.handle.net/1814/9864
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
This thesis is a theoretical study of the roles nations play in international politics, with a particular focus on Britain’s changing engagement with the international system since the Second World War. It notes the pervasiveness of the dramaturgical analogy—or the metaphor of the ‘world stage’—in reference to the behaviour of states in international affairs, but the general silence from International Relations (IR) as to the importance of the concept for the theory and practice of international politics. The thesis consequently puts forward an ‘interactionist’ approach to state roles, based on a reading of symbolic interactionism that, it is argued, can solve a number of the problems identified in the limited number of theoretical treatments of roles found in the literature. Such an approach focuses on the way shared understandings of a state’s proper place in the world, or its ‘role’, emerge and change through particular interactions. This lens is brought to bear on the case of Britain’s changing role in the post-War world, which, it is contended, offers a particularly salient example of a state that has altered the bases of its international relations in the recent past. Four episodes of Britain’s post-War foreign policy are then analysed in depth in order to gauge the changing meanings associated with Britain’s role on the world stage: the ‘Skybolt crisis’ of 1962, the withdrawal from East of Suez in 1968, the Falklands War of 1982, and finally Britain’s involvement in the international intervention in Kosovo between 1998 and 1999. It is argued in conclusion that the approach outlined in the thesis provides not only a more fine-grained analysis of Britain’s post-War experience than the dominant narratives represent, but that it also offers a useful theoretical framework with which to approach the study of state behaviour in international politics, one that significantly advances theorising within the constructivist paradigm and the English School tradition.
Defense date: 31/10/2008; Examining Board: Chris Brown (LSE), Friedrich Kratochwil (EUI) (Supervisor), Richard Little (Univ. Bristol), Pascal Vennesson (EUI/RSCAS)
Cadmus permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/9864
Full-text via DOI: 10.2870/21752
Series/Number: EUI PhD theses; Department of Political and Social Sciences
LC Subject Heading: Great Britain -- Foreign relations
Files associated with this item
There are no files associated with this item.