Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHODGES, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T13:02:40Z
dc.date.available2015-07-21T13:02:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/36536
dc.description.abstractThe US class action is the best-known tool of civil procedure for enforcement of mass private rights. It is intended to achieve judicial and procedural economy in civil procedure, and to exert significant pressure on corporate defendants to observe the law. This piece summarises the major empirical evidence on how the mechanism works. It confirms extensive enforcement of law. It also identifies issues of selectivity of case types (especially securities cases brought by investors), high transactional costs and reductions in sums received by claimants, the risk that high economic factors distort the legal merits of settlements, the limited evidence on evaluating the legal merits of outcomes, forum shopping, and aspects of conflicts of interest that have been criticised by European politicians as abusive. The piece notes that these features are predictable consequences of the policy of encouraging widespread private enforcement of law by incentivising intermediaries and reducing risk to claimants. Various questions are noted in relation to the future of collective redress in the different context of the European legal order.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/36536
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015/36en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Regulatory Private Law Project (ERPL-14)en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectClass actionen
dc.subjectMDLen
dc.subjectDeterrenceen
dc.subjectEmpirical evidenceen
dc.subjectCostsen
dc.titleUS class actions : promise and realityen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record