Reasonable accommodation : faith and judgment

dc.contributor.author	HILL, Mark
dc.date.accessioned	2016-02-02T15:29:07Z
dc.date.available	2016-02-02T15:29:07Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.issn	1028-3625
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38810
dc.description.abstract	This paper considers the approach of domestic courts and the European Court of Human Rights to the adjudication of religious liberty claims, contrasting them with the output of the United States Supreme Court. It questions the definition of religion and judicial illiteracy in faith based claims. It seeks to make take a fresh approach to such cases by recasting them as claims for freedom of conscience. It commends a nuanced application of the principle of reasonable accommodation.	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.relation	info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/269860	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	EUI RSCAS	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	2016/07	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	RELIGIOWEST	en
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	en
dc.subject	Religious liberty	en
dc.subject	Freedom of conscience	en
dc.subject	Eweida	en
dc.subject	Equality Act	en
dc.title	Reasonable accommodation : faith and judgment	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en