Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCARTER, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T15:29:33Z
dc.date.available2016-06-20T15:29:33Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and philosophy, 1995, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-23en
dc.identifier.issn0266-2671
dc.identifier.issn1474-0028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/41886
dc.descriptionPublished online: 5 December 2008en
dc.description.abstractThis paper is about the relevance, to the definition of freedom, of values or goods other than freedom. In this respect,its subject matter is not at all new. However, I do believe that new light can be thrown on the nature of this relationship by paying more attention to another relationship – one which exists within the concept of freedom itself. There are two senses in which we can be said to possess freedom. Firstly, there is the sense in which we can be said to be free to do a certain particular thing. Secondly, there is the sense in which we can be said to possess a certain 'amount','degree' or 'quantity' of freedom, in some overall sense. I believe that most recent accounts of the relationship between freedom and other goods are inconsistent, because they see those other goods as affecting the truth value of claims about freedom in the second sense, but not in the first.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics and philosophyen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/5195
dc.titleInterpersonal comparisons of freedomen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266267100003205
dc.identifier.volume11en
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.endpage23en
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record