Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-23T13:33:08Z
dc.date.available2018-01-23T13:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/50507
dc.description.abstractThe ‘constitutional failures’ ushering in World Wars I and II and the emergence of post-war ‘multilevel constitutionalism’ in Europe suggest that also UN/WTO law can effectively protect international public goods only if UN/WTO law are interpreted and protected for the benefit of citizens in conformity with the human rights and other ‘principles of justice’ recognized by all UN member states. This paper discusses recent publications by Philip Allott on ‘international constitutionalism’ and argues that the necessary transformation of the prevailing conceptions of ‘international law among sovereign states’ into a ‘multilevel constitutional law of humanity’ requires extending ‘multilevel constitutionalism’ to UN/WTO governance of public goods with due respect for ‘constitutional pluralism’ protecting individual and democratic diversity, subsidiarity and ‘institutional experimentation’.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMax Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2017/24en
dc.relation.urihttp://www.mpil.de/en/pub/publications/mpil-research-paper-series.cfmen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.title'Constitutional constructivism' for a common law of humanity? : multilevel constitutionalism as a 'gentle civilizer of nations'en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.3054442


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record