Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFOSSATI, Flavia
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T08:25:29Z
dc.date.available2018-02-08T08:25:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationSocio-economic review, 2018, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 523-544en
dc.identifier.issn1475-1461
dc.identifier.issn1475-147X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/51345
dc.descriptionPublished: 02 November 2017en
dc.description.abstractPolitical actors do not operate in a vacuum; rather, it is safe to assume that their preferences are influenced by the institutional context in which they operate. By means of novel interview data, which was collected in flexicurity countries, i.e. Denmark and Switzerland, and in dualizing countries, i.e. France, Germany and Italy, I investigate the preferences of parties, unions, state bodies, employers and social movement organizations towards traditional and activation strategies. I find that the institutional context indeed shapes preferences. The results reveal, for instance, that state bodies reject increasing activation efforts in flexicurity countries but support it in dualizing countries. Moreover, in line with previous research, social democratic parties are found to cater to the interests of insiders by endorsing the expansion of traditional measures in dualizing countries, while focusing on outsiders’ interests by preferring the expansion of activation in flexicurity countries.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofSocio-economic reviewen
dc.titleHow regimes shape preferences : a study of political actors' labour market policy preferences in flexicurity and dualizing countriesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ser/mwx040
dc.identifier.volume16en
dc.identifier.startpage523en
dc.identifier.endpage544en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record