| dc.contributor.author | BACHARIS, Grigorios | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-29T12:02:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-29T12:02:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | European journal of legal studies, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 387-396 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1973-2937 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/69733 | |
| dc.description | First published online: 18 February 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Is 'remedies' even a subject? This is the intriguing question Steve Hedley asks in Chapter 1 of the new Research Handbook on Remedies in Private Law, edited by Roger Halson and David Campbell.1 What is the added value of investigating remedies by themselves, seeing how intimately connected they are with substantive law and how dependent they seem on questions of procedure? After all, even the definition of remedies (to say nothing of their classification) is a permanent subject of controversy. 2 The Handbook helps explain exactly why remedial law is a worthy subject matter of its own. The editors have assembled an impressive array of contributions on the various aspects of remedial law in common law jurisdictions and beyond. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://ejls.eui.eu/ | en |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
| dc.title | Book review : Roger Halson and David Campbell (eds), Research and book on remedies in private law (Edward Elgar 2019) | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2924/EJLS.2019.041 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | en |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 387 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 396 | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en |
