Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFIORINI, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorHOEKMAN, Bernard M.
dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.contributor.authorSALUSTE, Maarja
dc.contributor.authorWOLFE, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T11:59:59Z
dc.date.available2021-02-23T11:59:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of world trade, 2020, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 667-698en
dc.identifier.issn1011-6702
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70204
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 30 September 2020en
dc.description.abstractThe WTO dispute settlement system is in crisis, following the decision of the United States to block new appointments to the Appellate Body (AB). The AB went into hibernation in December 2019, not having enough sitting members to be able to operate. What do WTO members think of the performance of WTO dispute settlement? How much do WTO members care about the existence and operation of an appeals mechanism? In this article, we report on the results of a survey of WTO Members’ perceptions of the AB and the role it plays (should play). We complement this with data on Members’ revealed preferences in their use of the dispute settlement system, their intervention in WTO debates on the AB crisis and their responses to demise of the AB. The data reveal strong support for the basic design of the dispute settlement system but also that the United States is not alone in perceiving that the AB went beyond its mandate. There are substantive questions that need to be addressed if the Appellate Body impasse is to be resolved.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherKluwe Law Internationalen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of world tradeen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Governance Programme]en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/65244
dc.titleWTO dispute settlement and the appellate body : insider perceptions and members’ revealed preferencesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume54en
dc.identifier.startpage667en
dc.identifier.endpage698en
dc.identifier.issue5en
dc.description.versionThe article is a published version of EUI RSCAS WP; 2019/95en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record