Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-07T08:42:38Z
dc.date.available2021-05-07T08:42:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationWenhua SHAN, Sheng ZHANG and Jinyuan SU (eds), China and international dispute resolution in the context of the 'belt and road initiative', New York : Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 51-77en
dc.identifier.isbn9781108561976
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/71161
dc.description.abstractIt discusses legal methodology problems of multilevel trade and investment regulation and explores related problems of adjudication involving investment projects in the context of BRI involving more than sixty-five countries. The very limited number of investor–state arbitration proceedings initiated so far by foreign companies against China – or by Chinese companies against foreign host states – suggests that alternative dispute resolution may become one of the important ‘legal innovations’ of BRI. Yet also involvement of third parties as ‘mediators’ or ‘conciliators’ in dispute settlement proceedings raises questions of ‘justice’ and of legal methodology that are easier to resolve by embedding BRI regulations into multilateral trade, investment and UN law.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.titleTrade and investment adjudication involving ‘silk road projects’ : legal methodology challengesen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108561976.004


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record