Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJENNE, Erin K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-04T08:41:37Z
dc.date.available2010-10-04T08:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/14615
dc.description.abstractThis paper conducts comparative historical analysis on three cases of devolution in interwar Europe (Aland Islands, Danzig and Memel) to identify the conditions under which devolving autonomy to minority regions is most likely to mitigate internal tensions. The analysis indicates that both advocates and detractors of devolution overstate the effects of this technique on ethnic tensions on the ground. This is because internal conflict is less responsive to domestic institutions than it is the wider geopolitical environment. While institutions can have an effect on the long-term tendency to engage in separatism, nested security on the regional and hegemonic levels may be a determining factor in whether autonomous institutions have an inhibiting or exacerbating effect on separatist conflict.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2010/65en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectconflict managementen
dc.subjectautonomyen
dc.subjectminoritiesen
dc.subjectdevolutionen
dc.subjectinterwar Europeen
dc.subjectLeague of Nationsen
dc.subjectDanzigen
dc.subjectAland Islandsen
dc.subjectMemelen
dc.titleManaging European Conflicts through Devolution: Lessons from the League of Nationsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record