Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJACOBS, Dov
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-19T12:48:04Z
dc.date.available2011-04-19T12:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationLeiden Journal of International Law, 2010, 23, 2, 331-342
dc.identifier.issn0922-1565
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16506
dc.description.abstractThis commentary argues that the Trial Chamber in Katanga adopted an erroneous interpretation of the Statute of the International Criminal Court by limiting the grounds to ne his in idem on which a challenge to admissibility can be brought after the confirmation of charges. The Trial Chamber held that the 'commencement of trial' under Article 19(4) is the moment of the constitution of the Trial Chamber, rather than the making of opening statements. This commentary re-examines the legal reasoning of the Court and advocates a different reading. It also suggests that the Chamber has failed to strike a proper balance between the possibility of making challenges to admissibility and the smooth and efficient working of the proceedings, which compromises the long-term legitimacy of the institution and the interests of justice.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Press
dc.subjectadmissibility
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Court
dc.subjectKatanga
dc.subjectne bis in idem
dc.subjecttreaty interpretation
dc.titleThe Importance of Being Earnest: The Timeliness of the Challenge to Admissibility in Katanga
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0922156510000063
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.startpage331
dc.identifier.endpage342
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record