Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLACEY, Joseph
dc.identifier.citationPhenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 2013, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 51- 73en
dc.descriptionPublished online 14 December 2011en
dc.description.abstractTerry Horgan and Mark Simmons’ work implies four criteria that moral phenomenology must be capable of meeting if it is to be a viable field of study that can make a worthwhile contribution to moral philosophy. It must be (a) about a unified subject matter as well as being, (b) wide, (c) independent, and (d) robust. Contrary to some scepticism about the possibility or usefulness of this field, I suggest that these criteria can be met by elucidating the very foundations of moral experience or what I call a moral ontology of the human person. I attempt to partially outline such an ontology by engaging with Robert Sokolowski's phenomenology of the human person from a moral perspective. My analysis of Sokolowski's thought leads me to five core ideas of a moral ontology of the human person: well-being, virtue, freedom, responsibility, and phronesis. Though I do not by any means boast a complete moral ontology of the human person, I go on to demonstrate how the account I have presented, or something like it, can go a long way to helping moral phenomenology meet the criteria it requires to be a viable and worthwhile pursuit.en
dc.relation.ispartofPhenomenology and the cognitive sciencesen
dc.titleMoral phenomenology and a moral ontology of the human personen

Files associated with this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record