| dc.contributor.author | FABBRINI, Federico | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-04T09:43:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-05-04T09:43:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Filippo FONTANELLI, Giuseppe MARTINICO and Paolo CARROZZA (eds), Shaping Rule of Law through Dialogue: International and supranational experiences, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 147-190 | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9789089520579 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/21798 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The chapter analyzes the evolution in the case law of the EU judiciary in the field of counter-terrorism. It explains how the initial self-restraint of the CFI in Kadi produced a problem of ineffectiveness in the protection of due process rights and how the subsequent revirement of the ECJ in Kadi represented a satisfactory response to the lack of judicial protection. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.title | Judicial Review of UN Counter-Terrorism Sanctions in the European Multilevel System of Human Rights Protection: A case study in ineffectiveness | en |
| dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |