Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGIGER, Nathalie
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-05T14:17:16Z
dc.date.available2012-07-05T14:17:16Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationLondon/New York, Routledge, 2011, Routledge/EUI studies in the political economy of welfare, 13en
dc.identifier.isbn9780415591980
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/22658
dc.description.abstractThis book contributes to the existing literature by providing an empirical analysis of the electoral implications of social policy. Giger asks the basic research question: What are the electoral consequences of social policy performance and retrenchment? More specifically, the following questions are addressed in order to provide a systematic test of the topic: Is retrenchment indeed completely unpopular? Do people punish the government for bad performance in the field of social policy? And what are the political implications of such a punishment reaction; does it affect the government composition? It shows empirically that the risks of welfare state retrenchment to incumbent governments may be lower than previously thought, and presents a theoretical framework for re-examining the impact of retrenchment initiatives on election outcome.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLondon/New York, Routledgeen
dc.titleThe Risk of Social Policy?: The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment and social policy performance in OECD countriesen
dc.typeBooken
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record