Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBHUTA, Nehal
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-11T15:39:39Z
dc.date.available2013-02-11T15:39:39Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationAnver M. EMON, Mark ELLIS and Benjamin GLAHN (eds), Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law: Searching for common ground?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 123-143en
dc.identifier.isbn9780199641444
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/25818
dc.description.abstractThis chapter argues that when looking for “common ground” between different moral and religious traditions, a historical approach which takes into account the historicity of specific norms and practices is desirable. Rather than take one set of principles as the universal norms to which other values must be assimilated, I argue that we must relativize both sets of values by trying to grasp their meaning and social significance within specific historical formations of politics, power and place.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleRethinking the Universality of Human Rights: A comparative historical proposal for the idea of 'common ground' with other moral traditionsen
dc.typeContribution to booken


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record