Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDAVEY, William J.
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-29T12:31:15Z
dc.date.available2013-04-29T12:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26794
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the major developments in WTO dispute settlement during three time periods (1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2012) and considers the effectiveness of the system in restraining the use of trade measures by the United States and the European Union. It finds that the first period was characterized by the large number of cases brought by the United States and the European Union and that the second and third periods were noteworthy for the increased number of cases brought by developing countries and by the numerous cases brought against the United States. On the question of effectiveness, the paper finds that the system has succeeded in restraining the use of WTO-inconsistent trade measures by the United States and the European Union, but often only after considerable delays in implementation of DSB rulings.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013/29en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-47en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectWTO dispute settlementen
dc.subject.otherRegulation and economic policy
dc.titleThe WTO dispute settlement system at 18 : effective at controlling the major players?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record