Civilization, culture, and race in John Crawfurd's discourses on Southeast Asia : continuities and changes, c.1814-1868
Florence : European University Institute, 2013, EUI PhD theses, Department of History and Civilization
MÜLLER, Martin, Civilization, culture, and race in John Crawfurd's discourses on Southeast Asia : continuities and changes, c.1814-1868, Florence : European University Institute, 2013, EUI PhD theses, Department of History and Civilization - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/28045
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
In this dissertation I examine the uses of the notions of civilization, race, and culture within a set of British 19th century discourses on especially Southeast Asian societies, their present state and history. Taking the point of departure in John Crawfurd's (1783-1868) publications, it contains a study of the many debates on economic, ethnological, historical, and linguistic issues in which he participated throughout six decades and to which he contributed significantly. Through this approach I aim at providing a densely contextualized analysis of the colonial, intellectual, political, and socio-cultural aspects of Crawfurd et al's knowledge production, its routes of transmission, receptions, and appropriations. The analytic focus is directed at the evaluative-descriptive qualities attributed to the terms civilization, race, and culture, and immanent in the concepts they refer to; on the surface claiming to be primarily descriptive, they nonetheless were normatively cogent in their inherent hierarchal and classificatory structures, as well as in providing a theoretical template delineating the naturalized historical trajectories. Arguing that the notions of civilization, race and culture were pivotal key concepts in this colonial knowledge production, I chart the intertwined dynamics between these notions / both in their conceptual framings and contextualized uses. During this quest I endeavour to demonstrate the interpretive primacy of the concept of civilization throughout the entire period, even though racial concerns clearly were on the ascendancy and by the 1860s constituted the major theme of discussion and dissent. Common to all the analysed discourses is that they were hinged upon these three fundamental notions and their ability to address the universal as well as the particular, their capacity to encompass the past, present and future within one interpretive framework, and not at least their provision of a conceptual common ground which also, however, facilitated the possibilities of fundamental dissent within the actual interpretations.
Defence date: 7 June 2013; Examining Board: Professor Sebastian Conrad, Freie Universität (Supervisor) Professor Jorge Flores, EUI Professor Michael Harbsmeier, Roskilde Universitet Dr. Christina Skott, University of Cambridge.; First made available online on 26 February 2015.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/28045
Full-text via DOI: 10.2870/233540
Series/Number: EUI PhD theses; Department of History and Civilization
LC Subject Heading: Great Britain -- Foreign relations -- Asia, Southeastern; Asia, Southeastern -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- Colonies -- Asia; Colonialism -- History -- 19th century; Crawfurd, John, 1783-1868
Files associated with this item
- Full-text in Open Access