Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCONTISSA, Giuseppe
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-19T15:26:38Z
dc.date.available2014-03-19T15:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationAviation and Space Journal, 2012, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 2-9en
dc.identifier.issn0970-3578
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30478
dc.description.abstractThe traditional model of compensation for damages arising from air crashes is based on civil liability, coupled with the provision of insurances for involved stakeholders (ANSPs, Air Carriers, Airports, etc.). In this contribution I shall consider the ATSSSA act, adopted in the US after September 11, which established a mechanism for the compensation of victims or air accidents which departs from the model of civil liability. In the immediate aftermath of September 11, the US airline industry appeared near to a collapse, as passenger travel dropped precipitously, while a large number of tort claims against air companies were going to be filled. In this scenario, the US Congress decided to bail out the airline carriers through subsidies, and established limitations on liability in their favour, while offering a quid pro quo to the air crash victims in the form of a compensation scheme.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofAviation and Space Journalen
dc.titleATSSSA victim compensation fund : a fair alternative to civil liability?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume11en
dc.identifier.startpage2en
dc.identifier.endpage9en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record