Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAYOUB, Phillip M.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-13T13:21:48Z
dc.date.available2014-10-13T13:21:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of international relations, 2015, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 293-322en
dc.identifier.issn1354-0661
dc.identifier.issn1460-3713
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/33093
dc.descriptionPublished online 1 September 2014en
dc.description.abstractThis article is concerned with the question of why lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) rights legislation is introduced at higher levels in some cases and less so in others. To address this puzzle, the article analyzes changes in LGBT rights legislation across European Union (EU) member states between 1970 and 2009. It focuses on the diffusion of five different categories of such legislation (anti-discrimination, criminal law, partnership, parenting rights, and equal sexual offenses provisions) to new EU member states in Central and Eastern Europe, compared with diffusion patterns in older EU member states. I argue that new-adopter states are more dependent on international resources for making new issues visible and are more inclined to see policy adoption as a means to gain external legitimacy and improve reputation. The analysis reveals that the transnational embeddedness of a state’s LGBT advocacy organizations is a powerful statistical explanation for successful policy diffusion to new EU member states, alongside international channels that lead to LGBT visibility among society and state authorities. In addition to lending cross-national, empirical reinforcement to some of the theoretical expectations regarding the international sources of diffusion, the results suggest variability in the determinants of LGBT policy adoption between the 15 old and 12 new EU states. Domestic factors, particularly economic modernization, are more relevant for policy adoption in the older member states, whereas the newer member states display greater dependence on transnational actors and are more influenced by international channels.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of international relationsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[COSMOS]en
dc.titleContested norms in new-adopter states : international determinants of LGBT rights legislation.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1354066114543335
dc.identifier.volume21en
dc.identifier.startpage293en
dc.identifier.endpage322en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.twitterfalse


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record