Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHIEN, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-27T14:20:37Z
dc.date.available2015-10-27T14:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationGerman politics, 2013, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 441-460en_US
dc.identifier.issn0964-4008
dc.identifier.issn1743-8993
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/37419
dc.descriptionPublished online: 4 December 2013en_US
dc.description.abstractSecularisation theory carried two implicit implications for Christian Democratic parties: either they become secular or they cease to exist. Both implications were wrong. Christian Democracy has neither vanished from the political landscape nor has it become fully secular. To secure its survival Christian Democracy has embarked on a delicate balancing act between the modern and the secular. Following up empirically on the thesis of Christian Democratic politics as being modern unsecular, the paper explores how much of the Christian element is still needed to explain Christian Democratic ideology and policy in the twenty-first century. By scrutinising the struggle surrounding Christian Democratic family policy in Germany, the paper finds that the conflict on the repositioning of Christian Democracy in a new cultural environment not only unfolds between secular modernisers and religious traditionalists. It has also led to the re-eruption of the interdenominational cleavage between Protestants and Catholics within the party.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGerman politics
dc.titleUnsecular politics in a secular environment : the case of Germany's Christian Democratic Union family policyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09644008.2013.853041
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.startpage441
dc.identifier.endpage460
dc.identifier.issue4


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record