dc.contributor.author | DE WITTE, Bruno | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-18T12:55:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-18T12:55:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European constitutional law review, 2015, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 434-457 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-5515 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1574-0196 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38449 | |
dc.description | Published online 1 December 2015. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Euro crisis reforms as major example of interstitial institutional change in the EU - Forms of institutional change : unusual sources of law, new tasks for the EU institutions, new organs, competence creep, institutional hybrids, and more differentiated integration - Question whether some or all of this amounts to a ‘constitutional mutation’ of the EU legal order - Reasons to doubt whether the constitutional fundamentals have changed - Alternative thesis: increased institutional variation, deepening the differences between EMU law and the rest of EU law. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | European constitutional law review | en |
dc.title | Euro crisis responses and the EU legal order : increased institutional variation or constitutional mutation? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1574019615000292 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 434 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 457 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en |