Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDE WITTE, Bruno
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-18T12:55:23Z
dc.date.available2016-01-18T12:55:23Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean constitutional law review, 2015, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 434-457en
dc.identifier.issn1744-5515
dc.identifier.issn1574-0196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/38449
dc.descriptionPublished online 1 December 2015.en
dc.description.abstractEuro crisis reforms as major example of interstitial institutional change in the EU - Forms of institutional change : unusual sources of law, new tasks for the EU institutions, new organs, competence creep, institutional hybrids, and more differentiated integration - Question whether some or all of this amounts to a ‘constitutional mutation’ of the EU legal order - Reasons to doubt whether the constitutional fundamentals have changed - Alternative thesis: increased institutional variation, deepening the differences between EMU law and the rest of EU law.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean constitutional law reviewen
dc.titleEuro crisis responses and the EU legal order : increased institutional variation or constitutional mutation?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1574019615000292
dc.identifier.volume11en
dc.identifier.startpage434en
dc.identifier.endpage457en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record