Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPORCHER, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T17:20:12Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T17:20:12Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationApplied economics, 2014, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 539-555
dc.identifier.issn0003-6846
dc.identifier.issn1466-4283
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39460
dc.descriptionPublished online: 19 November 2013
dc.description.abstractAs first noticed by Coase (1946), a standard result in utility regulation is that efficiency requires two-part tariffs with marginal prices set to marginal costs and fixed fees equal to each customer’ s share of fixed costs. Residential water customers in France face marginal prices for water that average about 8% more than marginal costs. Under price elasticity estimates that are consistent with previous results in the literature, efficiency costs represent around 8 million euros of welfare losses for 2008. Even though the impact is fairly small, current price schedules are an important pre-existing distortion which should be considered when evaluating current taxes aimed at addressing external costs. Moreover, efficiency gains from reformed tariffs could be used to fund water assistance programs focused on financially stressed households.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofApplied economics
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Water]en
dc.titleEfficiency and equity in two-part tariffs : the case of residential water rates
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00036846.2013.857001
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.startpage539
dc.identifier.endpage555
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue5


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record