Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHORN, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-11T16:52:21Z
dc.date.available2016-03-11T16:52:21Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationColumbia university academic commons, 2013, OnlineOnlyen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39772
dc.descriptionPublished online: 2 September 2013en
dc.description.abstractThis study contributes to the debate concerning the appropriate role of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) in WTO law, and in particular, in WTO dispute settlement. The distinguishing feature of the study is that it seeks to address the relationship between MEAs and WTO law in light of the reason why the parties have chosen to separate their obligations into two bodies of law without providing an explicit nexus between them. The basic conclusion is that legislators’ silence concerning this relationship should speak volumes to WTO adjudicating bodies: MEAs should not be automatically understood as imposing legally binding obligations on WTO Members. But MEAs could be used as sources of factual information, and their usefulness might extend even further, assuming certain conditions have been met.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofColumbia university academic commonsen
dc.titleMEAs in the WTO : silence speaks volumesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.7916/D8ZC80W6
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.twitterfalse


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record