Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNAURIN, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-26T15:10:55Z
dc.date.available2016-07-26T15:10:55Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationComparative politics, 2007, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 209-228
dc.identifier.issn0010-4159
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/42741
dc.description.abstractUnion According to deliberative democratic theory, transparency and publicity have a civilizing effect on political behavior, forcing actors to argue with regard to the public rather than engage in self-interested bargaining. Negotiation theory, in contrast, warns that transparency may damage effective problem solving and lead to sharper group polarization. Comparison of business lobbyists acting in institutional settings with varying degrees of transparency in Sweden and the European Union can test these theories. The results support negotiation theory. However, the deliberative perspective is also necessary to explain the behavior of lobbyists backstage, and standard two level games will often be inadequate in explaining transparency effects.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Politics
dc.titleBackstage behaviour? : lobbyists in public and private settings in Sweden and the European Union
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.startpage209
dc.identifier.endpage228
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record