| dc.contributor.author | SCHRAM, Arthur | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-09T15:07:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-09T15:07:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Constitutional political economy, 2016, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 214-226 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1043-4062 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1572-9966 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/45231 | |
| dc.description | First published online: 02 February 2016 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I discuss Gordon Tullock’s views on Experimentation in Economics, his own research experiment, and his influence on the field of experimental public choice. I argue that Tullock can credibly claim to have been an early supporter of the method and that his work is cited more often than that of other public choice scholars active in the same period. His work on rent seeking forms the basis of an extensive experimental literature and studies on trust, demand revelation and voter turnout have been strongly influenced by Tullock’s work. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Constitutional political economy | en |
| dc.title | Gordon Tullock and experimental public choice | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10602-016-9205-y | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 214 | en |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 226 | en |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en |