Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBELOT, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-02T14:59:48Z
dc.date.available2017-05-02T14:59:48Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationExperimental economics, 2017, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 19–43en
dc.identifier.issn1386-4157
dc.identifier.issn1573-6938
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/46228
dc.descriptionFirst Online: 22 February 2016en
dc.description.abstractWe provide experimental evidence on the ability to detect deceit in a buyer–seller game with asymmetric information. Sellers have private information about the value of a good and sometimes have incentives to mislead buyers. We examine if buyers can spot deception in face-to-face encounters. We vary whether buyers can interrogate the seller and the contextual richness. The buyers’ prediction accuracy is above chance, and is substantial for confident buyers. There is no evidence that the option to interrogate is important and only weak support that contextual richness matters. These results show that the information asymmetry is partly eliminated by people’s ability to spot deception.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental economicsen
dc.titleHow private is private information? : the ability to spot deception in an economic gameen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10683-015-9474-8
dc.identifier.volume20en
dc.identifier.startpage19en
dc.identifier.endpage43en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record