Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorELBASANI, Arolda
dc.contributor.authorŠELO ŠABIC, Senada
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T13:06:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T13:06:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European public policy, 2018, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1317-1335en
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763
dc.identifier.issn1466-4429
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/46346
dc.descriptionPublished online: 04 May 2017
dc.description.abstractWhy has the European Union’s (EU’s) promotion of rule of law (RoL) triggered different and largely surface-thin reforms across countries subject to a similar frame of enlargement in the Western Balkans (WB)? We hypothesize that the domestic (non-)enforcement of EU-promoted rules depends on the mobilization of politically autonomous constituencies of change – organized advocacy groups and autonomous state institutions – which enable democratic accountability. The empirical investigation focuses on the prosecution of political corruption as empirical foci to assessing the travails of EU-promoted rules in the domestic context. Specifically, we trace the role of (1) EU’s RoL promotion strategy, (2) political resistance and (3) domestic accountability in explaining different records of prosecution of political corruption in Albania and Croatia.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European Public Policyen
dc.titleRule of law, corruption and democratic accountability in the course of EU enlargementen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13501763.2017.1315162
dc.identifier.volume25en
dc.identifier.startpage1317en
dc.identifier.endpage1335en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue9en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record